Search
  • Charles H Coutts

Climate Change Is Not A Hoax, The Marxist Claim Of How to Stop It Is?

Updated: Sep 22


Image Source: http://www.truthandaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/earth-climate-change.jpg


PODCAST-


All of my Podcasts, video's, and Blog posts are my own opinion, agreeing with me is not a requirement to hear me out.


With all of the recent fear-mongering about climate change due to the fires on the west coast, I thought I would throw my two cents in as well.


Let's start out though by just cutting through the crap and getting to the logic right off the bat.


No one that I know of anyway has ever said that the climate is not changing, or that climate change itself is a hoax. Just like the Coronavirus, no one claims the virus is a hoax, it is the hysteria created around it that is the hoax.


Of course, the climate is changing, it has been ever since there has been a climate TO change after all.


It is part of the cycle that the earth has been in for some 4 billion years now.


So now that we got that out of the way we can dispense with the "climate change denier" crap which is nothing but a distraction anyway.


If anyone out there does claim that the climate is not changing they are doing so out of ignorance or they have an agenda of their own.


So let's move on.


Let's face it, man, people in power have been using the climate, weather, and natural disasters to create fear and use that fear to control people throughout human history.


I mean look all the way back to 7-10 centuries ago.


We were sacrificing people over a draught, or for a tornado that came through and destroyed our crops, floods, or any other natural disaster.


We believed wholeheartedly though due to those we called our leaders telling us so, that the weather or climate was doing what it was doing because we had angered the gods in some way.


And this pearl of wisdom came from what we would in the modern-day call our "experts" on the matter.


Usually, a priest or shaman.


These "experts" determined that the only way to appease these angry Gods was through human sacrifice and giving other types of offerings.


Food, gold, or any other valuables to be handed over to the priests or leaders who declared themselves mediators between we peasants and the angered Gods.


We know now of course that this was utter nonsense, but at the time we believed it.


It was a reality for us just like the lie is still being used today.


"Experts" instruct our "leaders" who hand down instructions to we peasants, like human sacrifice.


We peasants after all were really to blame for everything because it was we, not the rulers who had angered the Gods and caused the disaster in the first place.


So of course it was we peasants who had to do the sacrificing in most cases.


Also just like today with the exception of the Marxist ideology being thrown in to also demonize the wealthy who pretty much control all of our industry.


Back then the people in power told us to be afraid and also what WE needed to do in order to make it stop.


And unsurprisingly the only people who really benefited from all of this were the same people telling the populace what to do in the first place.


It solidified their power and increased both their control over that same population and its wealth.


They used fear to do that. Sound familiar?


Now people can sit here and shove scientific data that they do not even understand at me all day if they want to claim that climate change is caused by humans.


I will freely admit that I understand very little of it even though I know more than the average person does through my own research, and mostly I don't care.


Humans are a contributing factor as is everything else on and off this earth, Primarily the sun.


But humans are not the cause of it because I also understand that all of this part of the natural earth cycle that I learned about in grade school.


I also understand that the scientists producing this data are at the mercy of the people paying them for doing the research.


If the researchers want to keep their funding coming in, they will do and say exactly what the person with the checkbook tells them to do and say.


Including falsifying data either outright or using flawed methodologies in their research to produce a desired set of data.


They have been caught doing this numerous times so it is not like no one knows about it.


Denying that this is happening is naive.


Plus, we have the "fact-checkers" who pounce all over any opposing few point that does not follow the approved (bought and paid for) narrative.


If they were so confident in their data they shouldn't feel the need to censor data that disagrees with it.


If it's as solid and true as they claim, it should withstand the challenge right?.


The fact that they will not even allow it to be challenged is a pretty good indication that it is a lie.


Why would they do that unless they know it will not withstand being scrutinized which of course is exactly what the data and research they are censoring does?


It exposes that their data is flawed or outright wrong.


Then of course we have the best part with the claim that all of this is "settled science".


There is no such thing as settled science people, especially when it comes to the climate because on their own admission the climate is constantly changing which means the data is also continuously changing which of course means that nothing is settled.


The fact that they claim that the science is settled is all but admitting that they are lying because a claim like that is an impossibility. Not to mention they are contradicting their own claims.


Another method is that the researchers gather the data and it all gets handed over to someone else who interprets it.


These people are generally on the same payroll so again, the person with the checkbook decides what the data says.


No matter how it works the results are the same.


They manufacture the very data they need to back up their claim and then use it to scare the bejeezus out of we ignorant peasants who have no clue what we are looking at.


But we don't want to look or sound stupid so we nod our heads in agreement which is exactly what they already know we are going to do.


We have all heard it so no one can deny it unless they are woefully or willfully naive.


I will give just a few examples of this fear-mongering over things that never happened.


But first I want to point out that the people pushing these doomsday scenarios made a ton of money in donations off of these scare tactics.


They also over time steadily built a base of believers that they have been robbing blind over decades based on that fearmongering.


Is there anything more diabolical than to make ignorant people finance their own enslavement?


So again, here in the modern-day, we have the same thing we had all of those centuries ago when people were sacrificing their sons and daughters to an angry God who was using weather and natural disasters to punish them.


Except now, the angry God is called climate change and people are sacrificing their money and freedom to it out of fear.


The people pushing the fear today, as with then, are the only ones really benefitting from it.


As the saying goes, The more things change, the more they remain the same.


So let's go through a few of these "predictions" that have been used to frighten people and separate them from their money and freedom.


Many of these I remember from my own life and when I heard them as a child... they scared the life out of me.


And of course, as I mentioned earlier, this fear-mongering put boatloads of money into the fear-mongers pockets.


It also gave them power and control which is what this is really all about anyway.


I will just go through them quickly, but you can visit my blog at the link in the description to see more information on them.


Source: https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions


1967: ‘Dire famine by 1975.’ - Salt Lake Tribune, November 17, 1967

1969: ‘Everyone will disappear in a cloud of blue steam by 1989.’ - New York Times, August 10 1969

1970: Ice age by 2000- Boston Globe, April 16, 1970

1970: ‘America subject to water rationing by 1974 and food rationing by 1980.’

Redlands Daily Facts, October 6, 1970

1971: ‘New Ice Age Coming’ - Washington Post, July 9, 1971

1972: New ice age by 2070- NOAA, October 2015

1974: ‘New Ice Age Coming Fast’ - The Guardian, January 29, 1974

TIME, June 24, 1974

1974: Ozone Depletion a ‘Great Peril to Life’ - Headline

NASA Data | Graph

1980: ‘Acid Rain Kills Life in Lakes’ - Noblesville Ledger (Noblesville, IN) April 9, 1980

10 years later the U.S. government disproved that scenario

1988: Maldives completely under water in 30 years- Agence France Press, September 26, 1988 Rising sea levels but 32 years later and the Maldeves are still above water

1988: James Hansen forecasts increase regional drought in the 1990s-But the last really dry year in the Midwest was 1988, and recent years have been record wet.

1989: Rising seas to ‘obliterate’ nations by 2000- Associated Press, June 30, 1989 2000 came and went, no nations were obliterated by rising sea levels

2000: ‘Children won’t know what snow is.’

2002: Famine in 10 years if rich people didn't give up eating meat and fish. That would be this year folks and, no famine. Source: The Guardian, December 23, 2002

2004: Britain to have Siberian climate by 2020 - Source: The Guardian, February 21, 2004

2008: Arctic will be ice-free by 2018 - Associated Press, June 24, 2008, Well, the arctic is still covered with ice

2008: Al Gore warns of ice-free Arctic by 2013 - WattsUpWithThat.com, December 16, 2018

I mean Al Gore claimed that we only had 10 years to save the earth from climate change but the problem is that that timeline past us by in 2016, and we are still here.


Now we have the same people and new people in power telling us that we have 12 years to save the earth and of course the only way we can do that is by giving up all of our rights and become under the control of the state as well as giving up all of our money.


The tools may have changed but the methodology remains the same as it was all of those centuries ago when we were sacrificing people to change the weather or climate.


Create fear through unproven scenarios that predict catastrophe for the human race. then use that fear to control the population and enrich yourself in the process.


Now let's take a minute and set aside all of the fear-mongering and data that none of us understand anyway and look at things with some common sense.


The Earth is at the end of an ice age and what happens at the end of an ice age?


The earth starts to warm up, average temperatures begin to rise and as the ice melts it will inevitably cause sea levels to rise.


All of this of course will have sometimes drastic impacts on people's lives.


Tragically people will be displaced, people will die, droughts will appear in places they have never been seen before.


Storm activity will increase or decrease depending on several factors like location and regional climate.


So, everything that these people are saying will happen, will in fact happen at some point.


Eventually, the arctic probably will be ice-free as the ice age ends.


As time passes and more ice melt causing sea levels to rise low lying islands and coastlines will probably be underwater.


But it will all happen in a way that we will easily be able to adapt to the new world that will be created once this ice age ends entirely.


Probably a few thousand years from now.


The point is, these things are going to happen and there is not a damn thing we humans can do to stop it.


It WILL happen no matter what we do.


All we can do is adapt to the changes as they happen. And we will.


We have already been doing that for our entire history and we will continue to do it long after all of us alive today are dead and gone.


Trying to stop climate change is at best an exercise in futility, it is impossible and the people pushing the fear know this.


They are opportunistically using it for their own benefit. They are using you if you believe them for their own benefit.


That should piss you off.


Look.


I have been an environmentalist my whole life.


I worked on crews picking up litter, I have even been involved with a few environmental protests.


I was even a hair away from joining Greenpeace until I learned the truth about them.


I want to clean up our oceans, our land, I agree 100% that we as humans need to start moving away from fossil fuels and into more green energy.


What I am against however is HOW these people in power want to go about it because I know that it will cause far more problems than it will ever solve while enslaving the human race under tyranny in the process.


That is after all the true goal of all of this.


Climate change is not a hoax, it is happening and has been since before we humans ever showed up.


What IS a hoax, is the claim that we need to give up all of our rights and submit to state control so that THEY can solve the problem.


That is absolutely a hoax because as I said before, the changes that are coming from this ice age ending are going to happen no matter what we humans do.


It is an inevitability.


So my friends. Stop letting these liars manipulate you with a bunch of data and reports that you don't understand at all and just think about things for yourself.


Do some reading about the history of the earth and you will see that it has gone through catastrophic changes through its entire existence.


The whole earth was once a ball of fire, it was also once a ball of ice. Our climate has gone through massive changes and we humans today, we are just living through the latest one of those changes.


Our ancestors adapted and survived all of the previous climate changes and our descendants will adapt and survive the changes yet to come.


We do not need to enslave ourselves to the fear mongers or give them all of our money to do that either.


Use some good old fashioned common sense and remember that they have been playing this game with us for decades and not one of their "catastrophic predictions" has ever happened... not one over the last 50 or some odd years.


THAT is the hoax that is going on and the people pushing that hoax are master manipulators.


They claim that anyone that disagrees with them is a climate change denier so that you will not listen to us.


Well, I disagree with them and I admit that climate change is happening, I do not deny that at all, and in reality, the majority of people who disagree with them don't either.


But as long as they can keep people convinced that we are denying climate change is real, they can manipulate them into not listening to anything we say.


The thing we deny is their claim of WHAT is causing climate change, as well as the claim that giving them all of our money and submitting to their rule will somehow stop it from happening.


And that is what they do not want the misled masses to realize by listening to us.


Because if they lose the misled masses they lose massive amounts of money in donations and they also lose a substantial amount of their power and control over those masses.


They lose the ability to manipulate them and that is what all of this climate change crap is about at its core.


Just like it was centuries ago. Using fear to manipulate and control the population and enrich themselves in the process.


Old, old tactic but just as effective today as it was all of those centuries in the past because as with then, ignorance is the tool of tyrants.



14 views1 comment

© 2023 by Name of Site. Proudly created with Wix.com