© 2023 by Name of Site. Proudly created with Wix.com

November 11, 2019

Please reload

Recent Posts

The Left Blames Trump For A 16 Year Old Policy Passed By Democrats.

June 19, 2018

1/1
Please reload

Featured Posts

Is The EU Following A Dangerous Path?

August 11, 2019

 

 

They say that history repeats itself. I tend to see it more as a case of people repeat history. We can not separate ourselves from that by making it all seem like a simple twist of fate. After all it was we as a species who created that history to begin with, and we as species who repeat the same mistakes over and over again expecting a different result. All because "WE are so much smarter than THEY were." "WE have learned from THEIR mistakes." 

 

Really!

 

Because it seems to me you are not only making the same mistakes, you are following the path of the great monsters of the 20th century step by bloody step. The faces and the uniforms have changed but the core fascist ideology behind those faces has not changed one bit.

 

I mean, this has been done before, to the very same people. Now it seems the EU (European Union) is set to take its fascism and anti-Semitism to the global stage.

 

From the Washington Free Beacon

 

"Europe Poised to Put Warning Labels on Jewish-Made Products"

Legal decision reminiscent of Holocaust-era boycotts of Jews

 

'The European Union is poised to mandate that Israeli products made in contested territories carry consumer warning labels, a decision that could trigger American anti-boycott laws and open up what legal experts describe as a "Pandora's box" of litigation, according to multiple sources involved in the legal dispute who spoke to the Washington Free Beacon.

The Advocate General of the European Court of Justice recently issued non-binding opinion arguing that EU law requires Israeli-made products to be labeled as coming from "settlements" and "Israeli colonies."

 

The decision was seen as a major win for supporters of the anti-Semitic Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement, or BDS, which seeks to wage economic warfare on Israel and its citizens. Pro-Israel activists, as well as the Jewish businesses involved in the legal dispute, see the decision as an ominous warning sign that they say is reminiscent of Holocaust-era boycotts of Jewish businesses.

 

With the EU court's 15 judge panel now poised to issue its own binding judgment in the case, legal experts are warning that a potential decision mandating such labeling could pave the way for goods from any disputed territory to receive such treatment. The decision also could trigger U.S. anti-boycott laws meant to stop Israeli-made goods from being singled out for unfair treatment on the international market.

 

Brooke Goldstein, a human rights lawyer and executive director of the Lawfare Project, which is involved in the legal dispute, described the EU court's initial decision as "frankly outrageous."

 

The Argument:

 

"The Advocate General's opinion said that goods produced by Muslims are to be labeled from ‘Palestine,' and goods produced by Jews labeled as coming from ‘Israeli colonies,' Goldstein said. "Both people are living in the same geographic location, and yet Jewish goods are being treated differently."

 

"Could the discrimination be any clearer?" she asked. "If the EU Court justifies this bigotry it will degrade the rule of law in Europe and it will undoubtedly have many unintended consequences for EU traders. My understanding is that certain consumer protection agencies have already filed complaints to demand the similar labeling of goods from other disputed territories. This labeling fiasco will turn into a nightmare for EU importers of goods from any and all countries involved in territorial disputes. I trust the court will maintain that goods must be labeled indicating the geographical location of origin, and reject the push to politicize labeling."

 

 

After making its way through the lower court systems from a lawsuit filed by Israeli Psagot Winery, claiming unlawful discrimination against Jewish companies. it landed in Europe's  high court. The European Court of Justice.

 

Yaakov Berg, CEO of the Psagot winery, told the Free Beacon.

 

"I am not a psychologist, so I can't tell you what the motives are behind Europe's targeting of Jewish-owned businesses. Perhaps it is anti-Semitism rearing its ugly head again, perhaps it is blind ignorance, or even a desire to do the right thing.

 

"Regardless, the application of the current EU trade directive to label goods from Jewish producers, and only Jewish producers in the West Bank is discriminatory and illegal."

 

He continued.

 

"We are not the Israeli government," he said. "Psagot winery is not responsible for Israeli government policy. But because we are Jewish owners of a winery in a beautiful and hotly contested land, we are being targeted and punished. And we are being punished precisely because we are Jews living in Judea where we have every right to be, as do the Palestinian Arabs and Druze and the Christians."

 

"No one should be discriminated against because of their religion," Berg said. "If you support a Palestinian state, would you support a Judenrein state of Palestine? That seems to be what the EU is proposing when it says Jewish businesses are illegal in Palestine but Muslim businesses are not, in the same location! Such a de facto boycott of Jewish products, the likes of which we have not seen since Nazi Germany, would definitely run afoul of U.S. law."

 

Yohan Benizri, a lawyer representing Psagot added.

 

"One doesn't need legal training to recognize the unintended consequences of the EU adopting a policy of politicized labeling," Benizri said. "If the EU Court rules that geographic location is not enough, and that EU law mandates every product coming from either a ‘disputed territory' or a country with ‘objectionable social policies' be labeled as such, then EU markets will be thrown into chaos."

 

"Can you imagine a situation where plastic cups imported from China must be labeled ‘this country has a one-child policy,' or gas from Russia must be labeled, ‘This is gas from a country that illegally occupies Crimea,' or products from the United States require the labeling ‘the U.S. engages in capital punishment and is building an illegal border wall?' Product labels will have become political billboards depending on the whims of EU politicians, and every EU importer will shoulder a liability for not complying with arbitrary labeling laws."

 

Personally I believe that kind of "situation" is precisely what the EU leaders want to create. But that's me.

 

It is no secret how U.S. President Donald Trump feels about the Palestinian backed BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) movement. In short, he does not like it, at all. As stated by a State Department Official.

 

"The State Department is aware of this particular issue," the official said. "The administration's position strongly opposing all efforts to boycott, delegitimize, or isolate Israel is well-known."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Please reload

Follow Us

I'm busy working on my blog posts. Watch this space!

Please reload

Search By Tags